If your company is facing a software audit, Scott & Scott, LLP can help. Software audits by software publishers and their trade groups are on the rise. Many companies are paying substantial fines and suffering negative publicity resulting from license compliance investigations. If your business runs software published by Microsoft, Adobe, Autodesk, IBM, Oracle you may be at risk for a software audit.
Scott & Scott, LLP has developed a comprehensive solution to respond to software audit matters including technology to perform a software inventory and analysis, IT professionals that understand the technology used in a variety of businesses, and experienced attorneys to handle the legal process.
Our professionals have assisted businesses with various types of software audit matters such as:
- Software audits initiated by the Business Software Alliance (BSA) and the Software Information Industry Association (SIIA)
- Software asset management engagements & SPLA license reviews initiated by Microsoft
- License compliance reviews by Oracle and IBM
- Audit requests from Adobe, Autodesk, and other software publishers
- Federal Copyright Infringement Litigation Involving Autodesk & the SIIA.
- Arbitration of Copyright Infringement Claims before the American Arbitration Association.
Scott & Scott, LLP has represented over 500 companies across the United States in software audit matters. We have the knowledge and experience to protect your legal rights throughout the burdensome and expensive software audit process.
Software Audit Blogs
Superseding Audit Rights for Software Copyright Infringement: Settlement Agreements Versus Software License Agreements
Software Audit FAQ's
A: Negotiated audit terms and audit forbearance are concepts that come up frequently when negotiating software licenses. The best time to re-balance one sided provisions in license agreements is when new purchases or renewals are taking place. Many of our larger clients have standard audit clauses that they include as redlines in all software deals.
A: We generally do not suggest going back to the vendors on the dormant audits. There is too great of risk of resurrecting the audit and not much upside in terms of a close letter.
A: The most common pre-audit document we see when the big 4 are involved is the Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA). We generally edit the NDA to include some scoping details, most particularly a review period after the findings are made but before it is shared with the vendor. Other details regarding scope are generally beyond the purview of what auditors can agree to and are therefore usually negotiated directly with the vendor. We recommend that a pre-audit NDA be signed by the parties in all audit matters.
A: Subscription licenses have changed the software industry landscape in a number of ways. Most SaaS solutions are easier to account for from a compliance perspective and therefore traditional audits focused on deployments and entitlements are not as common. In some instances there are still disputes over whether or not the licenses are being used consistently with the license grant, i.e. geographic scope, no third-party access. In other cases, audits revolve around licensing metrics such as revenue, number of employees, etc. In short, while the topics differ from audits of on-premises software, there seems to be plenty to fight over in the Cloud.